In the note Limits Involving Infinity we saw that it is pretty easy to evaluate limx→0xx+1 because since limx→0(x+1)=1 and limx→0x=0 then division of 1 by very small number will give very large number, and so limx→0xx+1=∞.
But there are some cases when it is not so easy to calculate limit. In fact we can't state limit in general without knowing functions.
There are 4 cases.
Case 1. Suppose that limx→af(x)=0 and limx→ag(x)=0. We need to find limx→ag(x)f(x).
It is not very clear what is the limit of the ratio and does it exist at all. Very small number divided by the very small number can give anything.
Let f(x)=x1 and g(x)=x21. Clearly limx→∞x1=0 and limx→∞x21=0. Then limx→∞g(x)f(x)=limx→∞x21x1=limx→∞x=∞.
Let f(x)=x21 and g(x)=x1. Clearly limx→∞x21=0 and limx→∞x1=0. Then limx→∞g(x)f(x)=limx→∞x1x21=limx→∞x1=0.
Let f(x)=x3 and g(x)=x1. Clearly limx→∞x3=0 and limx→∞x1=0. Then limx→∞g(x)f(x)=limx→∞x1x3=limx→∞3=3.
Let f(x)=x and g(x)=x2. Clearly limx→0x=0 and limx→0x2=0. Then limx→∞g(x)f(x)=limx→∞x2x=limx→0x1 doesn't exist because limx→0+x1=∞ and limx→0−x1=−∞ so one-sided limits are not equal.
Therefore, in general case we can't find limit of ratio without knowing functions.
To characterize this special case we say that when limx→af(x)=0 and limx→ag(x)=0, expression limx→ag(x)f(x) is indeterminate form of type00.
Case 2. Suppose that limx→af(x)=±∞ and limx→ag(x)=±∞. We need to find limx→ag(x)f(x).
Again it is not very clear what is the limit of the ratio and does it exist at all. Very large number divided by the very large number can give anything.
Let f(x)=x21 and g(x)=x41. Clearly limx→0x21=∞ and limx→0x41=∞. Then limx→0g(x)f(x)=limx→0x41x21=limx→0x2=0.
Let f(x)=x41 and g(x)=x21. Clearly limx→0x41=∞ and limx→0x21=∞. Then limx→0g(x)f(x)=limx→0x21x41=limx→0x21=∞.
Let f(x)=x22 and g(x)=x21. Clearly limx→0x22=∞ and limx→0x21=∞. Then limx→0g(x)f(x)=limx→0x21x22=limx→02=2.
Again, in general case we can't find limit of ratio without knowing functions.
To characterize this special case we say that when limx→af(x)=±∞ and limx→ag(x)=±∞, expression limx→ag(x)f(x) is indeterminate form of type∞∞.
Actually we can trasnform this indeterminate form in indeterminate form of type 00.
Indeed, since limx→af(x)=∞ and limx→ag(x)=∞ then limx→af(x)1=0 and limx→ag(x)1=0.
So, limx→ag(x)f(x)=limx→af(x)1g(x)1.
Case 3. Suppose that limx→af(x)=0 and limx→ag(x)=±∞. We need to find limx→af(x)g(x).
Again it is not very clear what is the product of very small number and very large number.
This case can be transformed either into case 1 or into case 2.
Indeed, since limx→af(x)=0 then limx→af(x)1=∞. Therefore, we can write product as indeterminate form of type ∞∞: limx→af(x)g(x)=limx→af(x)1g(x).
Similarly, since limx→ag(x)=0 then limx→ag(x)1=0. Therefore, we can write product as indeterminate form of type 00: limx→af(x)g(x)=limx→ag(x)1f(x).
So, we have third indeterminate form: indeterminate form of type0⋅∞.
Case 4. Finally, suppose that limx→af(x)=∞ and limx→ag(x)=∞. We need to find limx→a(f(x)−g(x)).
Again it is not clear what will be difference of very large numbers.
Let f(x)=x and g(x)=2x. Clearly limx→∞x=∞ and limx→∞2x=∞. Then limx→∞(f(x)−g(x))=limx→∞(x−2x)=limx→∞−x=−∞.
Let f(x)=3x and g(x)=x. Clearly limx→∞3x=∞ and limx→∞x=∞. Then limx→∞(f(x)−g(x))=limx→∞(3x−x)=limx→∞2x=∞.
Let f(x)=x+5 and g(x)=x. Clearly limx→∞(x+5)=∞ and limx→∞x=∞. Then limx→∞(f(x)−g(x))=limx→∞(x+5−x)=limx→∞5=5.
So we can't find limit of difference without knowing functions.
To characterize this special case we say that when limx→af(x)=∞ and limx→ag(x)=∞, expression limx→a((f(x))−(g(x))) is indeterminate form of type∞−∞.
So, we have seen four types of indeterminate forms. In these cases we need to know sequences f(x) and g(x). To get rid of indetermination it is often useful to perform algebraic manipulations. Now, let's go through a couple of examples.
Example 1. Find limx→∞(3x2−5x).
Since limx→∞3x2=∞ and limx→∞5x=∞ we have indeterminate form of type ∞−∞.
To handle it, let's perform algebraic manipulations: 3x2−5x=x2(3−x5).
Now, since limx→∞x2=∞ and limx→∞(3−x5)=3 then their product is also very large number: limx→∞(3x2−5x)=∞.
Example 2. Find limx→∞(−4x3+5x2).
Since limx→∞−4x3=−∞ and limx→∞5x2=∞ we have indeterminate form of type ∞−∞.
To handle it, let's perform algebraic manipulations: −4x2+5x2=x3(−4+x5).
Now, since limx→∞x3=∞ and limx→∞(−4+x5)=−4 then limx→∞(−4x3+5x)=−∞.
Example 3. Find limx→∞(a0xk+a1xk−1+…+ak−1x+ak), where a0,a1,…ak are constants.
This is generalization of above two examples. If all coefficients a0,a1,…,ak have same sign then limit of this sequence is ∞ (or −∞). But if coeffcients have different signs then we have indeterminate form of type ∞−∞.
To handle it, let's perform algebraic manipulations: a0xk+a1xk−1+…+ak−1x+ak=xk(a0+xa1+…+xk−1ak−1+xkak).
Now, since xk→∞ and a0+xa1+…+xk−1ak−1+xkak→a0 as x→∞, then a0xk+a1xk−1+…+ak−1x+ak→∞ if a0>0 and xn→−∞ if a0<0.
Example 4. Find limx→∞7x+33x2−5x.
Since limx→∞(3x2−5x)→∞ and limx→∞(7x+3)→∞ we have indeterminate form of type ∞∞.
To handle it, let's perform algebraic manipulations. Factor out x raised to the greatest degree in numerator and denominator (in this case x2): 7x+33x2−5x=x2(x7+x23)x2(3−x5)=x7+x233−x25.
Now, since 3−x5→3 and x7+x23→0 as x→∞, then x7+x233−x25→∞.
Example 5. Let limx→∞8x7+3x6x4−3x2.
Since limx→∞(6x4−3x2)→∞ and limx→∞(8x7+3x)→∞ we have indeterminate form of type ∞∞.
To handle it, let's perform algebraic manipulations. Factor out x raised to the greatest degree in numerator and denominator (in this case x7): 8x7+3x6x4−3x2=x7(8+x63)x7(x36−x53)=8+x63x36−x53.
Now, since x36−x53→0 and 8+x63→8 as x→∞, then limx→∞8+x63x36−x53→0.
Example 6. Find limx→∞7x2+33x2−5x.
Since limx→∞(3x2−5x)=∞ and limx→∞(7x2+3)=∞ we have indeterminate form of type ∞∞.
To handle it, let's perform algebraic manipulations. Factor out x raised to the greatest degree in numerator and denominator (in this case x2) 7x2+33x2−5x=n2(7+x23)x2(3−x5)=7+x233−x5.
Now, since 3−x5→3 and 7+x23→7 as x→∞, then limx→∞7+x233−x5=73.
Example 7. Find limx→∞b0xm+b1xm−1+..+bm−1x+bma0xk+a1xk−1+…+ak−1x+ak where a0,a1,…,ak and b0,b1,…,bm are constants.
This is generalization of above three examples. We have indeterminate form of type ∞∞.
To handle it, let's perform algebraic manipulations. Factor out xk from numerator and xm from denominator: b0xm+b1xm−1+…+bm−1x+bma0xk+a1xk−1+…+ak−1x+ak=xm(b0+xb1+…+xmbm)xk(a0+xa1+…+xkak)=xk−m(b0+xb1+…+xmbma0+xa1+…+xkak).
Second factor has limit b0a0. If k=m then xk−m=1→1 and required limit approaches b0a0. If k>m then xk−m→∞ and required limit approaches ∞ (or −∞, sign depends on sign of b0a0). If k<m then xk−m→0 and required limit approaches 0.
Example 8. Find limx→∞x(x+1−x).
We can rewrite it as limx→∞(xx+1−xx)=limx→∞(x2+x−x).
This indeterminate form of type ∞−∞.
When we deal with radicals, we need to multiply both numerator and denominator by conjugate radical. Here we multiply both numerator and denominator by x2+x+x:
Now, we will calculate limit that we will need later.
Example 9. Find limx→0xsin(x).
As x→0sin(x)→0, so we have indeterminate form of type 00.
Before finding this limit we need to prove that for 0<x<2π we have that sin(x)<x<tan(x).
For this consider circle with radius r, tangent AC to circle and central angle x.
Clearly area of triangle AOB is less than area of sector AOB, and area of sector AOB is less than area of triangle AOC.
We have that area of sector AOB is 2πx⋅πr2=21r2x.
Since area of triangle AOB is 21r2sin(x), area of sector AOB is 21r2x and area of triangle AOC is 21r2tan(x) then 21r2sin(x)<21r2x<21r2tan(x) or sin(x)<x<tan(x).
Now, since 0<x<2π then we can divide sin(x) by each member of inequality (don't forget to invert inequality signs): sin(x)sin(x)>xsin(x)>tan(x)sin(x) or 1>xsin(x)>cos(x).
Thus, we obtained that cos(x)<xsin(x)<1.
As x→0cos(x)→1 that's why limx→0cos(x)=1, so, by Squeeze Theorem limx→0+xsin(x)=1. (we wrote one-sided limit because we considered interval (0,2π)). Since xsin(x) is even function then also limx→0−xsin(x)=1. Since one-sided limits are equal then limx→0xsin(x)=1.
From this limit we can find other limits.
Example 10. Find limx→0x21−cos(x).
Here we have indeterminate form of type 00.
Since 1−cos(x)=2sin2(2x) then x21−cos(x)=x22sin2(2x)=214x2sin2(2x)=21(2xsin(2x))2.
Since x→0 then 2x→0 and so limx→02xsin(2x)=1.